Powered by Blogger.

Heidi Mendoza

30 September 2012

Heidi Mendoza is the underdog. Again.

But then, the good guys (or in this case, the good 'girl') always are.

That alone was evident in the Inquirer article I read about Heidi Mendoza's testimony against Elenita Binay for graft charges. The reporter, Cynthia Balana, was quite liberal in jotting down the side of Elenita Binay, as expressed in the words of Joey Salgado, the Vice President's spokesman. What was notable is the absence of the side of Heidi Mendoza, who was made to look, at least in this news article, like she was holding a grudge against the Binays when she was simply doing her job. 

Thankfully, Winnie Monsod set the record straight in her column, where she not only sympathized with Heidi Mendoza but also questioned why her COA appointment was still not confirmed by the CA.

I wish I could do more for Ma'am Heidi. But a simple gesture of support for her cause is the only thing I can give. 

Again, Heidi Mendoza is the underdog. But underdogs need not stand alone.

Hypertension

Seems like I'm going to deal with high blood pressure after all.

I tried out the new gadget Mama brought home for Papa. It was an automatic blood pressure monitor and I was surprised to find out that my BP reading is now at 130++/80++, give and take a few numbers. I was expecting something closer to 120/90, my BP reading two years ago.

Technically, I'm not yet suffering from hypertension but I'm getting there, perhaps after several months (or hopefully, years). Nevertheless, this new development is a mood-killer. Seems like being an exercise/gym rat isn't good enough after all.

And so starts my transition towards a stricter vegan diet...

Mar Roxas Again

Mar Roxas got confirmed by the Commission on Appointments (CA) as the new chief of the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).

As for me, all I can remember are the columns by William Esposo and Boo Chanco extolling Mar Roxas' sheer incompetency as a government bureaucrat. Indeed, Mar Roxas has done such a good job as the DOTC secretary then that NAIA 1 has zoomed to become the world's worst airport under his watch.

Which is why I cannot fathom why a lot of people in high government expect him to fare better in his new department. If he had such a mediocre time in the DOTC, then how is the DILG any different from the previous department he headed? But the president has confidence in Roxas and that surely must be enough, especially since our government is not a meritocracy anyway.

It's also quite ironic that Mar Roxas' appointment got confirmed by the CA while Jesse Robredo's was bypassed again and again. Apparently, being an accomplished public servant isn't enough to win you the CA's nod. But a good name like Roxas does.

Praying For Someone

Have you prayed for someone? Have you prayed for a person who is not a family member? Or even a close friend?

Back in college, I prayed for Denise. I prayed that she be happy. It came after her tearful sharing during our recollection concerning a personal incident which she regretted. I prayed for her for several days during my daily morning prayer. I don't know if it worked but the last time I checked she's married already and is living abroad. That must be her version of happiness but, then again, I'm being presumptuous.

I've also prayed for my crushes. But not the type of prayer you would expect from someone infatuated to the core. I simply prayed for their happiness. If that happiness involved me being part of their lives, then that's not my call. So I kept it simple: "Lord, I pray that whoever-she-is will be happy." 

Now, I'm still trying to insert a prayer for someone during my daily ritual.  It's a practice that has humbled me enough to think that it's really not about me. It's also a refreshing change of perspective; the wish for another person's happiness is something which, for me, invigorates my soul.

Have you prayed for someone lately?

(SIC)

Atty. Brion was the first to show us what the word sic (usually found in quotations) are for. I, on the other hand, always thought it was some kind of intellectual cuss word.

According to Wikipedia:

The Latin adverb sic ("thus"; in full: sic erat scriptum, "thus was it written") added immediately after a quoted word or phrase (or a longer piece of text), indicates that the quotation has been transcribed exactly as found in the original source, complete with any erroneous spelling or other nonstandard presentation. The usual purpose is to inform the reader that any errors or apparent errors in the transcribed material do not arise from transcription errors, and the errors have been repeated intentionally, i.e., that they are reproduced exactly as set down by the original writer or printer. It may also be used as a form of ridicule or as a humorous comment, drawing attention to the original writer's spelling mistakes or emphasizing his or her erroneous logic. Sic is generally placed inside square brackets, or in parentheses (round brackets), and traditionally in italic, as is customary when printing a foreign word.

There you go.

Wallpaper

Take a look.

That is what is adorning my laptop for almost a year now. It's also the wallpaper on my phone. 

I'm not bragging (or am I?) but I just realized how intrinsically me the wallpaper is.

It's quite simple really, the phrase "Ang Evangelio Ni Paolo" set against a white backdrop,  curtly adorned with simple brush strokes of blue and violet streaks.

Whereas some would go for extravagance and intricacy in their design, somehow to show how adept they are at using Photoshop or some other application, I, on the other hand, gravitate towards the idea that "less is more", practicing sophisticated restraint and simple elegance.

Take a look again.

Days In Palawan

Day 1
Went with Mama to the airport. She was going to Zamboanga and I was bound for Palawan. Spent much of the waiting time trying to read through my cases. Surprisingly, the flight was not delayed. Read some more on board the plane (Got an entire row all by myself. Laid there like I was on a queen bed). Weather in Palawan was dreary, with a slight drizzle. Picked up by the travel tour's van. Stopped by Robinsons to get some much needed fastfood. Then off we were to several hours of travel by land to reach El Nido. Roads were quite bumpy during the last stretch. Had dinner in a restaurant then rode off on motorcycles to the cottages where we were supposed to spend the night. Just tired from the travel.

Day 2
Woke up and caught first sight of the coastline. Island hopping was the menu for the day. Had breakfast and we were off to visit the islands near El Nido. Snorkeling, getting inside caves. Lunch was delicious. Then, more island visits. Fish feeding, sight seeing, pictures taken and so on. Dinner back at the cottages. Really sleepy. But had talks with Grace and Nica. Illuminating. Meaningful discussion of sorts, something I never quite had with the boys. True, women do offer a fresh perspective on things one assumes one knows.

Day 3
Early wake-up call. 4AM. Vacation is taking its toll. Miss my bed. Talked with Sir Ramy about something I really wanted to know about him (finally!). Then the arduous journey back to Puerto Princese. Breakfast along the way. Then bad news. Underground river was closed for the day. Heavy rains were the culprit. Back in Puerto, in a hotel room. Had lunch somewhere (forgot the name). Then the city tour. Rain. Then back to hotel room. Dinner along baywalk.

Day 4
Final day. Again, very early wake-up call. 5:30AM. Bad news again. No underground river. Went to Ugong cave instead. Zip line. Then off to a beach. After more than an hour travel, finally reached the beach. Had lunch by the beach. Back to Puerto. Pack bags. Take a bath. Off to airport. Back to Davao.

Love the vacation. Not bad at all.

Dalagang Filipina

Several weeks ago, I was shocked. An officemate revealed to me that she got pregnant and was now on her seventh week. It was shocking because I thought it was never in her character to engage in premarital sex. I had always been the believer of the presumption of virginity among Filipinas and I found it hard to accept that I was so naive.

On the same day, after being told of my reaction, another officemate also told me that she was also into premarital sex. And to think that she was only nineteen years old when she started!

What is wrong with the world? Or, to be more specific, what's wrong with today's Filipina?

First, I have always been a believer of sex after marriage primarily because sex has a potential to distort any given relationship and, thus, must be enjoyed only within the confines of a committed relationship, the one already sealed with a wedding ring. Second, I have always thought that if a man loves a woman, then he is willing to wait for her even it means going through the arduous process of courtship, then the girlfriend-boyfriend phase, the engagement, and finally the wedding (It's a test, get it?). Third, I have also been brought up to acknowledge that sex has to be enjoyed only when both parties are fully aware of the responsibilities entailed in the act, an awareness that cannot be logically inferred from an arrangement where both are willing to have sex but are not willing to make the sex legitimate in the eyes of society.

 Yes, I'm traditional but I also know I'm right. Filipina women, in seeking for themselves the sexual liberty that men enjoy, have lost the power that their grandmothers and mothers wielded.

The woman of yesteryears, the dalagang Filipina, knew what she wanted and knew what she possessed to help her get it. She wanted a partner in and for life. She could have that if she withheld herself from engaging in amorous relations . The power she had was inherent in her power to say no to sex without the benefit of marriage. And history would tell us that the strategy is quite good: men committed themselves to their wives and wives got committed husbands in return.

Has that lesson been lost in today's society? Or are today's Filipinas willfully relinquishing that power in return for something which is, quite sadly, ephemeral?

The Gap

Karlo, a classmate of mine, narrated to me the story of his life when he was still a law student of the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU). In hindsight, I wished he hadn't because I finally realized why Ateneo is Ateneo and why UM is UM.

The disparity is immense. According to Karlo, if you're in Ateneo, one can never aspire to be both a law student and a professional because your studies are going to eat up all your time. His routine then consists of eight hours of reading every day because every teacher of every subject would task his or her class to read at least ten cases daily. If you can't understand that, I tell you now that's a lot of material to go through in a given day.

Add to that is the fact that the faculty of Ateneo are relentless in their efforts to trim down the herd. Presumably, about half (or is it more?) of the freshmen population are wittled down by year end. It is no wonder that a law student in ADDU is more prepared for the Bar Exam than, say, a law student in UM.

That's the gap and I can't help but feel helpless facing this stark reality. What am I to do?

Ambitious Undertaking

Okay. I'm going to do something: I'm going to make a computer application. It's going to be my project next year and the reason why it's ambitious is because I don't have the slightest idea of how I'm supposed to do it. Definitely, it's not my area of expertise. I'm not a programmer and I don't know what it takes to be one. But the reason why I'm going to do the impossible is because I want to make things better for all of us in the office. I want to somehow leave a mark and say that I did in fact make the lives of my colleagues better after I arrived at the scene. Right now, I'm not at liberty (I so love this phrase) to disclose anything but, rest assured, once I sort out my free time, I'll be hell bent in learning programming and the other stuff.

Game on.

An Idea For A TV Series

16 September 2012

I have an idea. Because of my current infatuation with The Big Bang Theory, I have also thought of a TV series primed for Philippine TV.

It's also a comedy sitcom in the vein of Home Along The Riles. It features the story of three male law students who are informed by their land lady that she's taking in another boarder, her niece from the US. Comedic mayhem ensues as the group wrestles with the fact that there's another lady in their previously "all-boys" castle and that this lady wishes to teach them that there's more to life than preparing for the Exam.

Obviously, I just parroted  out a common plot in what I've seen among US comedies (New Girl  has the same plot by the way): have several guys in a place then add a girl into their group.

As of today, I can't think of any joke from law school that I can use for the show. Maybe, when I progress further in my studies, I'll be able to discover some of those.  As for the experience of living in a boarding house, I think I can get some side notes from my stay in Manila and my current exile away from home.

But, basically, that's the concept. I don't know if it will work but when it does, be sure to watch this show on TV.

Roughnecks: Starship Troopers Chronicles

However late (like "several years late"), let's pause for a moment of silence for this show.

For those familiar, this show aired on Philippine free TV about the same time when "Let's Go" was ruling Sunday morning cartoons. It chronicled the missions of the Roughnecks, an infantry unit tasked to eradicate the "Bugs", an alien race similar to insects which is bent on eradicating humanity.

The show got cancelled however and it took me several years before I chanced upon a Youtube user who uploaded almost all of the episodes on the website.

The history of the show was replete with misfortune. Because of production cuts and less-than-stellar viewership, the show had to cut off several episodes, including the finale.

The irony was that the show was actually pretty good. For its time, its CGI effects were amazing. The storyline was tight. The characters were memorable.

But life can be unfair at times. So rest in peace, roughnecks.

The Big Bang Theory

I have to confess that I'm hooked. First, there was House, then Bones, then the 70's show, then finally this. The Big Bang Theory. Another TV show addiction is blooming in my life.

My fascination with the show started less than a month ago. There had been several posts in 9gag about the show but I found one so humorous that I was finally intrigued. I went over the fan sites and I was even more curious. So I watched the pilot episode and I fell in love with the characters.

Sheldon is the stereotypical nerd who is socially aloof and ignorant of popular culture. Leonard is his roommate who has a die-hard infatuation with Penny. Penny is the next-door neighbor who is not only pretty and gorgeous but is the guru of the two when it comes to social conventions. Also entering into the picture are the cast of friends: Raj, Howard, and Leslie Winkle (Is she a friend? Or an opportunistic Machiavelli?), who each bring their own idiosyncrasies into every scene. Fascinating.

Though I'm not a genius, I could easily identify with the protagonists. I admit that I've had lapses when dealing with norms and there are times when I come out as either insensitive or ignorant. One other reason why I love the show is because Penny is so cute even if she's not trying to be (To digress, I believe it was a decision straight from the producers to have Penny clad in shorts and tank tops in almost every episode. They are probably thinking that move would make the show more appealing to the male audience. I think it works).

Right now, I'm nearing the end of Season 2 and I'm looking forward to Season 3. Though the novelty has worn off, the show still manages to make me laugh with every episode.  

Digesting

Digesting. For a law school student, that term is synonymous with drudgery and toil.

Digesting refers to the act of reading a legal case, sucking its marrow, and spitting the masticated bits onto a piece of paper. To be more blunt, it's the act of summarizing a case into its vital components: the facts, the issues, and the court's rulings on the issue.

I hate digesting. Three months into law school and I still hate it. The reading part is easy but the writing part isn't. Writing on a notebook is something I left back in college (My handwriting leaves much to be desired). I can understand but when understanding must translate into written text, I let out a silent scream. Putting a pen on paper is, for me, an agony.

But still, I digest. And one thing I cannot fathom is the fact that I'm digesting pretty much what should be left alone. The prose of some decisions of the Supreme Court are quite beautiful and expertly crafted that to simply summarize these is tantamount to sacrilege.

Maybe, that's the entire point of the exercise. One is to read and read some more until the vocabulary, the language used, the semantic undertones of each legal phrase employed by the justices are sublimated into one's mind. Writing is simply to prove that, indeed, this act of sublimation has actually happened.

Yano

Mama shared this term to me. Yano. It's Bisaya for common, ordinary. Usually, it's used to describe some one's appearance. It's a term with another connotation; it points to someone, usually a lady, who may not look beautiful at first but seems to morph into a beauty queen the more you look at her.

Wala lang. Just sharing.

Virtuous

14 September 2012

Just sharing. 

No write-ups this time. Just go straight to the article. Got it from here.
 
The Virtuous Life Is Worth Living: Real Men Choose Virtue

TIM GRAY

The virtues give us a blueprint for being a man. Indeed, the very term virtue comes from the Latin word for man, vir. For the ancients, to be manly was to be virtuous. The term virtue in Latin (virtus) signifies power, strength, and ability.

The virtues give us a blueprint for being a man. Indeed, the very term virtue comes from the Latin word for man, vir. For the ancients, to be manly was to be virtuous. The term virtue in Latin (virtus) signifies power, strength, and ability. Thus the virtues are habits that give us the power to act in a manly way, with strength sufficient to do what is right. Without virtues we will neither be godly nor real men. Virtues are the building blocks of character, and without them our moral lives will eventually collapse under the pressures of the world.

Virtues are essential to living well and, even more, to living the Christian life well. St. Peter exhorted the early Christians about the vital role of the virtues saying, “[M]ake every effort to supplement your faith with virtue” (2 Pet. 1:5). A few verses later he admonishes us that practicing the virtues will keep us from being “ineffective or unfruitful” in following Jesus Christ (2 Pet. 1:8). In other words, our lives will only be as effective, meaningful, and fruitful as we are virtuous. No wonder St. Peter admonishes us to “make every effort” to obtain virtue.

Our society assumes that values are the key to morality. Values-based moral education programs exemplify the modern conviction that morality is nothing other than the art of making good choices, which are guided entirely by one’s values. One could critique this approach to morality on philosophic grounds, but my criticism is simple and to the point. The bottom line is that values do not make men moral. That may sound radical, but let us look at some commonsense examples.

I can value sailing, but that does not make me a sailor. Likewise, many men can value fidelity to marriage, but that does not make them faithful. Indeed, most men who have committed adultery valued fidelity (no need for value clarification), but despite their values they tragically abandoned their vows. Having good values is a fine thing, but the battle of morality is not so much about knowing what is right as it is doing what is right. The difference between wanting to do good and actually doing it is tremendous.

For example, I can value flying, spend countless hours as a passenger, and be the most avid aviation fan around, but that does not enable me to fly a plane. In order to fly, one must have the skills of a pilot. Many people want to fly, but few have the ability. If our moral life is to get off the ground, we must acquire the skills necessary to fly.

Many men want to be good husbands and fathers, but if this wanting is not supplemented by the virtues — the skills for successful moral living — then a successful landing will be unlikely. To guide the ship of our moral life to port we must be men who are seasoned in the virtues, and so possess the habits that will enable us to live the values we profess. Values alone will not suffice.

In our forthcoming Bible study on the virtues, Curtis Martin and I give a thorough explanation of what virtues are and how they operate. We then examine the four cardinal virtues: prudence, justice, fortitude (i.e., courage), and temperance, and also the three theological virtues: faith, hope, and love. For this article, let’s take a detailed look at just one of these, the virtue of courage. St. Thomas Aquinas understood that courage is the form of all the virtues, for to practice any virtue consistently takes the firmness of character that comes with courage. For example, to be honest requires courage, especially when telling the truth is difficult.

Of all the virtues, courage is the one that is often particularly associated with men. Men are to be tough and strong, and therefore courageous. Too often, however, this association gives us a narrow picture of courage, a picture that sees courage as simply for fighting. Undoubtedly, soldiers need to be fortified with courage, but courage is bigger than the battlefield. Courage is required in a variety of ways that we seldom even realize. For example, do you realize that to be generous with our money and material goods takes courage? The things that require the virtue of courage can range from taking care of someone with a serious illness, taking a plane trip, or simply studying. Indeed, the virtue of courage is so basic that we need it to exercise all of the other virtues.

What is courage? Courage is the strength of will that enables us to conquer fear. It often happens that we know what we ought to do, but we’re afraid to do it because of the consequences we may suffer as a result. Fear makes our will disinclined to follow our reason because of some difficulty. Courage ensures that we will have the firmness of mind and will to overcome our fear and do what is right and good regardless of the difficulties. Thus St. Thomas Aquinas says that “fortitude of soul must be that which binds the will firmly to the good of reason in face of the greatest evils” (Summa Theologiae IIa Iiae q. 123, art. 4).

Scripture gives us many examples of how men allow fear to dictate their actions. Note how fear dictated each person’s actions in the following Scripture passages.

    Genesis 3:10 (Adam hid himself from God’s presence our of fear.)
    Numbers 13:1-14:10 (Ten of the 12 spies bring an evil report of the Promised Land out of fear that God will not be with them in the battle to take the land.)
    1 Samuel 17:19-24 (Men of Israel flee from battle against Goliath and the Philistines out of fear that they will perish in battle against them.)
    Mathew 14:3-12 (Herod doesn’t kill John the Baptist initially our of fear of the people, and later has him beheaded out of fear of going against his rash oath in front of his guests.)
    John 19:38 (Joseph of Arimathea was a secret disciple out of fear of the Jews.)

NO PAIN NO GAIN

Fear causes us to withdraw from a perceived difficulty. We fear to suffer some evil or to lose something we desire, and so we allow fear to dictate our actions, rather than act according to what is right in keeping with God’s will and law.

Fear can be so strong as to prevent people from acting because of some difficulty or threat. So, some people may fear to fly, and thus their fear keeps them from traveling, whether for business, family, or faith. Imagine if St. Paul were overcome by fear of sailing (traveling by ship in his day was far more dangerous than by plane in our own) and decided not to evangelize much of the Roman Empire? Or, what if Beethoven would have given in to his fears and stopped writing symphonies after he went deaf? Much good can be lost through fear.

All our daily challenges require the firmness of mind and will that the virtue of courage provides. A student may fear to take the best course in his field, because the professor is demanding. A man may be afraid to evangelize a coworker out of fear for how he will be regarded or out of fear of not being able to answer every objection. Some are afraid to use a computer or learn a new skill because it may be too complicated for them. We fear to say no to others because we want to be liked. In the home, how many fathers fail to discipline their children for fear that their children will not like them? People fail to be honest out of fear. Whenever we lie it is because we fear that telling the truth will cause us some kind of grief.

Fear hinders us from being men of action; it is much safer to be a spectator in life. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. The key to being a man of action is to be a man of courage. This virtue gives us the resolve to resist temptations and to overcome obstacles in the moral life (cf. Catechism, no. 1808). As compared to all other people, Christians have the most reason to take courage, because our God is God of all creation and has redeemed us and freed us from the powers of evil. In Joshua 1:9, God tells Joshua: “Be strong and of good courage; be not frightened, neither be dismayed; for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.” The reason God gives Joshua for taking courage is that He, God Himself, will be with Joshua.

Like Joshua, we too have been given a mission, and if we call upon the God who is present to us we shall succeed. All our obstacles will fall as the walls of Jericho fell before Joshua.

COURAGEOUS TO THE END

Courage also entails that we be ready to die for the sake of what is right. Our Christian faith makes it clear that we must be willing to die rather than sin. This is what the martyrs have done in laying down their lives for Christ.

A classic example of this aspect of courage is found in the story of Eleazar (cf. 2 Mac. 6:18-31). During a pagan persecution of the Jews, an old man Eleazar is told to sacrifice to the gods and eat pork, which is forbidden to Jews. The narrative says that Eleazar took courage as men should and refused to break the law of God, even under threat of death and torture. Some of the officials give Eleazar the option of faking his homage to the gods, but he replies: “For even if for the present I should avoid the punishment of men, yet whether I live or die I shall not escape the hands of the Almighty. Therefore, by manfully giving up my life now, I will show myself worthy of my old age and leave to the young a noble example of how to die a good death willingly and nobly for the revered and holy laws” (2 Mac. 6:26-28, emphasis added).

Eleazar is an exceptional model of how even the good of this life must not be held dearer than God and His law.

To navigate well the stormy seas of our lives, we need the firmness of character that comes through the virtue of courage. Without courage we will shrink back from acting, and our many fears of wind and waves will keep us from persevering in our arduous journey. Values will not keep our minds and hearts steeled against the storm, but the habit of courage will give us the strength to sail ahead, come what may, by God’s grace.


Fear creates cowards, men who give up the truth or some good for fear of suffering. Courage, on the other hand, empowers us to take on life’s challenges, and this gives us solid character. Let’s examine some of the Scripture’s examples of courageous men:

    1 Samuel 17:32-49 (David goes up against Goliath, trusting in God’s deliverance.).
    Daniel 3:8-28 (Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refuse to deny their faith by worshipping a false god.).
    Matthew 14:3-4 (John the Baptist speaks the truth even though it landed him in jail and cost him his life.).
    Mark 15:43 (Joseph of Arimathea gives public witness to Jesus by asking to care for His body.)

Literary Criticism And Contemporary Music

09 September 2012

Back in college, we did exercises on popular music. The aim was to select a song and dissect the lyrics through the lens afforded to us by the theories of literary criticism. It was fun. It also made us aware of how banal or how intricate some songs really are based on their lyrics.

To be honest, a song can never be appraised, let alone appreciated, by its lyrics alone. A bigger component is its melody, the music which draws everything together.

But applying literary criticism on songs adds another level of evaluating these artworks. It is as if we are not only scrutinizing the appearance of an orange but we are also tasting its pulp and savoring its juices.

I wonder why we don't do this as often as we should.
 

Pangitaa Gud

Ang Pulong Sa Ignoy